Comments on: Google Guice Tutorial http://www.factorypattern.com/google-guice-tutorial/ Just another Object Oriented Weblog Sat, 07 Jan 2012 02:36:06 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Rajesh Kanna http://www.factorypattern.com/google-guice-tutorial/comment-page-1/#comment-407 Rajesh Kanna Wed, 21 Dec 2011 21:32:22 +0000 http://www.factorypattern.com/google-guice-tutorial/#comment-407 Very useful... Thanks :-) Very useful… Thanks :-)

]]> By: Rama http://www.factorypattern.com/google-guice-tutorial/comment-page-1/#comment-374 Rama Fri, 11 Mar 2011 00:09:12 +0000 http://www.factorypattern.com/google-guice-tutorial/#comment-374 Nice. This is really useful tutorial for understanding the basics of google guice dependency injection. Thanks a lot. Nice. This is really useful tutorial for understanding the basics of google guice dependency injection. Thanks a lot.

]]> By: Luis http://www.factorypattern.com/google-guice-tutorial/comment-page-1/#comment-358 Luis Tue, 09 Nov 2010 19:22:00 +0000 http://www.factorypattern.com/google-guice-tutorial/#comment-358 O, but I still don't get it. I've followed this example, implemented and executed it. OK, it's fine that we can put things differently, but don't really get the advantage. Actually, it's kind of weird for debugging, isn't it? And it's code-invasive. So I'm trying to find an example where I could really see the difference. I guess when we're using an interface, it's because in few cases we'll use an implementation and in another case we'll use another one, but how shold this be working? I mean, what advanatage I have? Apart from that, I have to say you put the easiest post to follow this. Congratulations and thank you. O, but I still don’t get it. I’ve followed this example, implemented and executed it. OK, it’s fine that we can put things differently, but don’t really get the advantage. Actually, it’s kind of weird for debugging, isn’t it?

And it’s code-invasive. So I’m trying to find an example where I could really see the difference. I guess when we’re using an interface, it’s because in few cases we’ll use an implementation and in another case we’ll use another one, but how shold this be working? I mean, what advanatage I have?

Apart from that, I have to say you put the easiest post to follow this. Congratulations and thank you.

]]> By: Tommyboy http://www.factorypattern.com/google-guice-tutorial/comment-page-1/#comment-288 Tommyboy Fri, 04 Jun 2010 13:55:21 +0000 http://www.factorypattern.com/google-guice-tutorial/#comment-288 Splendid post, thanks! Splendid post, thanks!

]]> By: dayanand kumar singh http://www.factorypattern.com/google-guice-tutorial/comment-page-1/#comment-281 dayanand kumar singh Fri, 19 Mar 2010 06:08:08 +0000 http://www.factorypattern.com/google-guice-tutorial/#comment-281 i want to create a new guice factory i do not now method and process so please help me soon i want to create a new guice factory i do not now method and process so please help me soon

]]> By: admin http://www.factorypattern.com/google-guice-tutorial/comment-page-1/#comment-13 admin Tue, 29 Apr 2008 19:26:35 +0000 http://www.factorypattern.com/google-guice-tutorial/#comment-13 As I know that's the only way to change the default binding: creating a Module class. Additionally a Provider (not discussed in this post) class can be created encapsulating some logic to decide at runtime which implementation should be provided. The problem you described seems to be solved using a strategy pattern. Maybe I would go for it is I couldn't create a Module class... As I know that’s the only way to change the default binding: creating a Module class. Additionally a Provider (not discussed in this post) class can be created encapsulating some logic to decide at runtime which implementation should be provided.

The problem you described seems to be solved using a strategy pattern. Maybe I would go for it is I couldn’t create a Module class…

]]> By: Gregg Bolinger http://www.factorypattern.com/google-guice-tutorial/comment-page-1/#comment-12 Gregg Bolinger Tue, 29 Apr 2008 15:38:39 +0000 http://www.factorypattern.com/google-guice-tutorial/#comment-12 Good article. The only thing missing is how you bind both Notifier implementations and use one or the other without writing a Module to do the binding. There would be times when you would need to switch between sending and email and sending an SMS in a live environment. How do you handle that? Good article. The only thing missing is how you bind both Notifier implementations and use one or the other without writing a Module to do the binding. There would be times when you would need to switch between sending and email and sending an SMS in a live environment. How do you handle that?

]]> By: admin http://www.factorypattern.com/google-guice-tutorial/comment-page-1/#comment-11 admin Sat, 26 Apr 2008 10:10:30 +0000 http://www.factorypattern.com/google-guice-tutorial/#comment-11 Fixed it in the post. :) Thanks:) Fixed it in the post. :) Thanks:)

]]> By: WurstFromHell http://www.factorypattern.com/google-guice-tutorial/comment-page-1/#comment-10 WurstFromHell Fri, 25 Apr 2008 20:22:05 +0000 http://www.factorypattern.com/google-guice-tutorial/#comment-10 Nice article. As I tried your examples I stumbled upon a little mistake at the end: Customer customer = injector.getInstance(Customer.class); must be Customer customer = anotherInjector.getInstance(Customer.class); I'm looking forward to your next article! Nice article. As I tried your examples I stumbled upon a little mistake at the end:

Customer customer = injector.getInstance(Customer.class);
must be
Customer customer = anotherInjector.getInstance(Customer.class);

I’m looking forward to your next article!

]]> By: admin http://www.factorypattern.com/google-guice-tutorial/comment-page-1/#comment-9 admin Fri, 25 Apr 2008 16:49:02 +0000 http://www.factorypattern.com/google-guice-tutorial/#comment-9 You're right, I've updated the article. Thanks for the remark :) You’re right, I’ve updated the article. Thanks for the remark :)

]]>